International Crime Witness-Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia’s Court System’s Likely View on the Accused’s Rights, as well as the Court System’s Likely Treatment of the Defendant During Trial Proceedings
Saudi Arabia has strict laws regulating people’s conduct, and individuals found guilty of major crimes such as robbery and violence are severely punished. Therefore, the court must prove that an individual is guilty so that it can adhere to Sharia laws that state that a person should only be punished for a crime they are guilty of (1). Thus, The court system will likely allow the defendant to account for what happened. The court can then compare the narrative provided by the defendant with the witness statement. There is a high likelihood that the court will put the defendant’s interests first because he is a local and the witness is a foreigner. Suppose a jury is involved in determining the case’s outcome. In that case, they may rule that the defendant is innocent because of the assumption that a foreigner may not understand people’s behaviour in Saudi Arabia or that the witness may be biased towards people from Saudi Arabia. The court system is also likely to create a fair trial for the defendant to make a good impression on the foreigner, thus granting the defendant the right to legal representation. In Saudi Arabia, defendants can hire a lawyer to offer them legal counsel and represent them in court. For defendants who cannot afford to hire legal counsel, the court system allows them to request the court to appoint one or create appropriate legal representation at the state’s expense. The court system may also view the defendant as innocent because the witness is a foreigner, and there is no additional evidence besides the foreigner’s testimony. Do you need help with your assignment ? Contact us.
The court system may not treat the defendant guilty during trial proceedings because he is a local. Therefore, he may win the case and walk as a free man if the witness testimony does not convince the system that the defendant committed the crime. It may be argued that the witness may mistake the defendant with someone else due to the resemblance of most people in Saudi Arabia. The court may also view the defendant as a victim of racial bias because the witness is a foreigner whose interpretation of things may be influenced by stereotypes about Saudi Arabia and its local people. On the other hand, the court system may view the defendant as an enemy running the country’s reputation to foreigners. Therefore, he may be charged as guilty of portraying a good image of Saudi Arabia’s justice system to foreigners so that they can feel safe visiting the country.
Most Likely Experience the Defendant Will Have Within Saudi Arabia’s Prison System
According to Wilcke & Human Rights Watch (2008), Saudi Arabia’s prison system neglects the needs of prisoners by denying them access to proper sanitation, required legal help, and medical care. A person’s social status dictates the right to appeal and whether their family knows an influential person or someone from the royal family. The defendant will likely be denied an appeal, and the court system may frustrate his efforts to appeal by denying him legal representation. Saudi Arabia’s court system also relies on witness statements recorded by arresting officials. In the current case, the witness is a foreigner who may have to travel back to Saudi Arabia in case of an appeal, which is why the Saudi Arabia court system may take all measures possible to prevent a draw. The prison system may also discriminate against the defendant because he is from a lower social standing than the foreigner. If Fatwa is implemented, the defendant may also not escape prison. Fatwa is common when punishing individuals convicted of violent crimes (2). However, government intervention is needed to determine whether the defendant should be punished under Fatwa.
Ethical Concerns Witnessed Regarding Saudi Arabia’s Court and Correctional Systems
The main ethical concerns witnessed regarding the court in Saudi Arabia and the correctional system are denying defendants the right to a fair trial and coercing them to accept the verdict. After passing the judgment, I realized the defendant was not content with the ruling. I expected an appeal, but the prosecution later informed me that the defendant was not appealing. Upon asking around, I was told that the only people in Saudi Arabia who appeal are the wealthy and people connected to the royal family. I was told that other detainees warn defendants not to resist a court ruling because that would only prolong their sentence. It was also said that authorities coerce defendants to give false confessions that incriminate them. The prosecution also holds the burden of proof, and all evidence is contained in an evidence room to ensure that no alternative explanation conflicts with the facts presented in court.
Recommended Correctional Intervention
The United States has a history of maintaining the efficiency of corrective interventions. Education programs would impact the Saudi Arabia case. Saudi Arabia has a high unemployment rate due to a lack of skills and a mismatch between acquired and required skills (3). Therefore, most people, particularly the youth, turn to crime to get the money they need to survive. An education program is thus an effective corrective intervention in the country because it will equip locals with skills that enhance their relevance in the job market.
References
Alasti, S., & Bronson, E. (2017). Saudi Arabia. The Encyclopedia of Juvenile Delinquency and Justice, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118524275.ejdj0214
Al-Bishr, I. I., & Al-Bishr, I. I. (2010). Judicial systems and safeguards of human rights in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Ithaca Press.
Alrasheedy, A. (2019). The cost of unemployment in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 11(11), 30. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v11n11p30
Wilcke, C., & Human Rights Watch. (2008). Precarious justice: Arbitrary detention and unfair trials in the deficient criminal justice system of Saudi Arabia.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
International Crime Witness-Saudi Arabia
After providing your report to the professor in Assignment 2, the country’s governing body asks you to return to the country and testify in the court proceedings. While abroad, your professor asks you to report on the court proceedings and correctional system.
Use the Internet and the Strayer Library to research court proceedings and the correctional system in the country you selected in Assignment 2.
Write a 3–5 page paper in which you:
Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights and the court system’s potential treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis.
Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Justify your view of the country’s prison system.
Expose two ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
Provide one correctional intervention that has been effective in the U.S. criminal justice system and explain how that intervention would impact your elected foreign case. Justify the intervention.
Use at least four quality references. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not count as quality references.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your system.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Evaluate the similarities and differences between international criminal justice issues and the United States criminal justice system.