Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation: Enhancing Patient Identification to Improve Safety Outcomes

Introduction and Purpose of the In-Service Session

Patient safety is a fundamental responsibility in healthcare, with accurate patient identification being one of the most critical components. This in-service session aims to raise staff awareness, educate on evidence-based practices, and strengthen skills related to patient identification to prevent errors that compromise safety, quality, and patient outcomes: Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation: Enhancing Patient Identification to Improve Safety Outcomes.

The purpose of this session is to equip nurses and clinical staff with knowledge and practical tools to significantly reduce patient misidentification errors. This activity is specific to the formation of unified strategies in recognizing and prioritizing patient-related practices, technology applications, and orientation to safety. At the end of the training, the participants should be able to grasp the root cause of patient misidentification, assess their role in contributing to it, and learn how to enhance safety. In parallel with this, the objective is to reduce patient identification errors by 60% in one year and to increase the confidence and competency of the staff while implementing best practices.

The Need for and Process to Improve Safety Outcomes

Why Address Patient Misidentification?

Patient identification errors are among the most frequent and potentially detrimental to a patient’s health if not correctly diagnosed and treated. In a study conducted by Howick et al. (2024), the average of misidentification events was found to be 13 %, where it is evident that 50% of identification errors arise due to miscommunication, hence affecting patient safety and hospitals’ reputation.

Beyond clinical risks, the financial burden is significant. Every wrong identification error costs healthcare facilities between $1000 and $5000 in the form of extra tests, longer stays in the hospital, and compensation to patients (Rodziewicz et al., 2024). These are also self-prejudiced and can lower patient confidence and even perceived quality of care. This issue can be addressed under the proposition of the Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals (2024), which withheld those two forms of identification be used each time a patient is encountered (Wadhwa & Boehning, 2023).

Improvement Plan Process

This improvement plan implements a broad and evidence-based approach to eliminating incidents of patient misidentification. The first component that needs to be implemented is the identification of the patient by two forms – full name as well as date of birth before giving medication and any other procedure or tests that may be conducted within the healthcare facility. This has to be done across all the functions to reduce the chances of using memory or even identification, as these have been observed to lead to errors.

The second strategy concerns the improvement of the barcode scanning procedure’s effectiveness. This covers aspects such as bar-coded patient wristbands and the use of the barcode scanner to identify the patients. Using barcode scanning is one of the ways of minimizing the rate of medication errors, which has been estimated to range from 43% to 80%, according to Howick et al. (2024).

The third subcomponent includes the use of AI to create Electronic Health Record (EHR) alerts. It is done to give real-time alerts to avoid discrete records and merge or copy the patient records, which may make the information a bit unreliable due to updates.

Finally, the plan also requires staff training and reinforcement on a quarterly and simulation basis. This maintains ongoing skill enhancement and leaves patient identification as one of the top agendas. In the study by D’Angelo and Kchir (2022), from frequent simulation activities, staff competency increases by 35% and almost complete elimination of wrong identification mistakes.

Audience Role and Importance to the Plan’s Success

The Critical Role of Nurses and Clinical Staff

The clinical staff and nurses, being the direct caregivers of the patients, are crucial to the implementation of this safety improvement plan. Specific tasks of their activities include confirmation of patient identification by at least two independent identifiers, proper functioning of the bar code systems, reporting of the irregularities, and proper documentation that is accurate at all times. Nurses also perform a teaching role, informing the patient and the family members about the right identification and involving the patients in the process. This is especially important with patients who are unconscious, young or elderly patients, or suffering from conditions that affect their cognitive development.

Why Their Role Matters

The success of this improvement plan lies solely within the control of the nurses and clinical staff on a daily basis. Even the best of structures and technology can do nothing without the dedication and hard work of its participants and professionals. On the same note, staff compliance with patient identification procedures limits adverse occurrences and legal complications, thus averting harm to patients.

Additionally, their proactive involvement fosters a culture of accountability and safety. When nurses fully commit to this program, the organizational healthcare system becomes efficient in its operations, free from delays, and delivers patient satisfaction. Similarly, in the study conducted by Rodziewicz et al. (2024), identification enhancements made by nurses decreased the costs of healthcare and removed redundant recordation and other processes.

Resources and Activities to Encourage Skill Development

Simulation Exercises

This in-service session will incorporate simulation exercises to reinforce learning and ensure practical application. This practical activity entails the participants performing an exercise in identification checks, both by hand and through the use of barcode scanning. These will involve pressurized scenarios, including admittance to the emergency department or preparation for an operation to examine the concentration of the staff.

Additional simulations will comprise specific cases, such as communication with non-verbal patients or patients from different countries, which will help the staff consider other ways of verification. The intended use is to increase the level of confidence and ability in the application of identification protocols, irrespective of the conditions involved.

Case Study Reviews

The session will also consist of the description of actual-life cases of adverse incidents that happened due to patients’ misidentification. These cases will be assessed and scrutinized by the staff in order to identify the weaknesses and to what extent the improvement plan may be of assistance in reducing the damages. This activity enhances critical thinking among the participants and effectively completes the exercise, making them understand that correct identification procedures should be followed.

Interactive Q&A Sessions

An open Q&A session will provide staff with the opportunity to voice concerns, share experiences, and ask questions about the new processes. Emerging issues, such as what one should do if the barcode scanner is not working or if the information that is displayed on the EHR is not accurate for a particular patient, will also be discussed. These will not only manage expectations for what is required and what can be accomplished but will also deal with issues that might hinder implementation before they arise.

Soliciting Feedback and Future Improvements

Feedback Collection Methods

Gathering feedback is vital to refining the improvement plan and meeting staff needs. Self-administered questionnaires will be given out to participants after each session to gauge the session’s contents’ understandability and relevance. Mentor-based discussions will allow the members of each group to freely discuss and get input on how to solve problems. Also, the digital suggestion box will be mounted to encourage feedback given at any time by the staff on any idea or issue they may wish to convey. These practices also guarantee improvement of the health system and encourage the staff to participate in patient safety improvement.

Integration of Feedback

All feedback will be carefully reviewed to identify trends, common concerns, and suggestions for improvement. This information will help modify future training, improve the use of technology in further evolution, and, as a result of such changes, change the Protocol where necessary. This means that there will be an agreed feedback mechanism to ensure the safety improvement plan is always relevant and backed by the staff. Thus, by incorporating staff knowledge, the organization can regularly update its experience and provide sufficient safety to the patients.

Conclusion

Patient misidentification is a preventable yet persistent issue that threatens patient safety, healthcare quality, and institutional integrity. This in-service presentation is designed to empower nurses and clinical staff with the knowledge, skills, and resources necessary to implement standardized patient identification practices effectively.

Through the consistent use of two identifiers, adoption of barcode scanning technology, integration of AI-driven EHR alerts, and regular simulation-based training, the organization aims to reduce misidentification errors by 60% within one year. Nurses and clinical staff are critical to this success, and their active engagement ensures that patient safety is upheld at every level of care.

Continuous feedback and process improvement will sustain these efforts, creating a culture of safety where patient identity is never assumed but always verified. By embracing this initiative, the healthcare team can significantly reduce risks, improve outcomes, and strengthen patient trust.

References

D’Angelo, A.-L., & Kchir, H. (2022). Error management training in medical simulation. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546709/

Howick, J., Bennett-Weston, A., Solomon, J., Nockels, K., Bostock, J., & Keshtkar, L. (2024). How does communication affect patient safety? Protocol for a systematic review and logic model. BMJ Open, 14(5). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11131125/

Rodziewicz, T. L., Houseman, B., Vaqar, S., & Hipskind, J. E. (2024). Medical error reduction and prevention. National Library of Medicine; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499956/

Wadhwa, R., & Boehning, A. P. (2023, March 16). The Joint Commission. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557846/

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

---

This assignment 3 is based on 59648 &59718

Assessment 3

Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation

For this assessment, build on the work that you have done in your first two assessments and create an agenda and PowerPoint of an educational in-service session that would help a specific staff audience learn, provide feedback, and understand their roles and practice new skills related to the safety improvement plan you created.

The final deliverable for this assessment will be a PowerPoint presentation with detailed presenter’s notes representing the material you would deliver at an in-service session to raise awareness of your chosen safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue and to explain the need for such an initiative. Additionally, you must educate the audience as to their role and importance to the success of the initiative. This includes providing examples and practice opportunities to test out new ideas or practices related to the safety improvement initiative.

Be sure that your presentation addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

• Describe the purpose and goals of an in-service session focusing on a specific patient safety issue.
• Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue.
• Explain to the audience their role and importance of making the improvement plan successful.
• Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative.
• Communicate with nurses in a respectful and informative way that clearly presents expectations and solicits feedback on communication strategies for future improvement.
  

  Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation: Enhancing Patient Identification to Improve Safety Outcomes

There are various ways to structure an in-service session; below is just one example:

• Part 1: Agenda and Outcomes.
  • Explain to your audience what they are going to learn or do, and what they are expected to take away.
• Part 2: Safety Improvement Plan.
  • Give an overview of the current problem focusing on a specific patient safety issue, the proposed plan, and what the improvement plan is trying to address.
  • Explain why it is important for the organization to address the current situation.
• Part 3: Audience’s Role and Importance.
  • Discuss how the staff audience will be expected to help implement and drive the improvement plan.
  • Explain why they are critical to the success of the improvement plan focusing on a specific patient safety issue.
  • Describe how their work could benefit from embracing their role in the plan.
• Part 4: New Process and Skills Practice.
  • Explain new processes or skills.
  • Develop an activity that allows the staff audience to practice and ask questions about these new processes and skills.
  • In the notes section of your PowerPoint, brainstorm potential responses to likely questions or concerns.
• Part 5: Soliciting Feedback.
  • Describe how you would solicit feedback from the audience on the improvement plan and the in-service.
  • Explain how you might integrate this feedback for future improvements.
• APA format: Use APA formatting for in-text citations. Include an APA-formatted reference slide at the end of your presentation.
• Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your assertions. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

• Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.
  • Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue.
  • Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative.
• Competency 4: Explain the nurse’s role in coordinating care to enhance quality and reduce costs.
  • Describe the purpose and goals of an in-service session focusing on a specific patient safety issue.
  • Explain to the audience their role and importance of making the improvement plan successful.
• Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.
  • Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. Speaker notes are clear, organized, and professionally presented.
  • Organize content with clear purpose or goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).