How and Why Matthew May Have Edited Marks Gospel
According to the first passage, Mark 6:45-52 and Matthew 14:25-27,32-33, Matthew’s version of Mark’s gospel is arranged differently. The fact is that even when Matthew includes a section from Mark’s gospel in its text, it is often altered in some way: it may be enlarged, shortened, or even rearranged (Martin 107). Interestingly, Matthew’s gospel often closely matches Mark’s organization, which is very robust evidence that Matthew drove with the gospel of Mark’s gospel exposed before him, as such a tight correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. Matthew does not always track Mark’s imperative and arrangement, but once it is in his interest, he does. He also feels at liberty to expurgate Mark’s gospel into pieces and restructure when certain actions were understood to have occurred (Muddiman & John 56). Fashionable in this case, it’s implying that Matthew could monitor Mark’s planning so precisely. It’s also interesting to see how Matthew will sprinkle in Mark’s sentences from time to time.
Mathew’s first and second chapters are based on the original book. Mark’s chapters 4 and 3 are followed by Mathew’s chapters three and four. Throughout Mark’s first 5 chapters, as well as other doggerels from subsequent periods, much of the content is mixed with material from Matthew. With a few omissions, Matthew begins to follow Mark’s gospel in chapter 14. The account in Mark is simplified (Mark 6:45–52). As Jesus stays behind to do the lion’s share of the work and to pray, he sends his followers across the Sea of Galilee on a boat. When they see Jesus walking on water, the disciples have to exert themselves and row against a severe headwind. Jesus calmed them, and then he got into the boat with them. Suddenly, the wind stops (Martin 107). In addition to adding a few components to the tale, Matthew fills in certain details and enhances the story (Matt 14:22–33). A more dangerous situation is depicted in Matthew: the boat was “battered by the waves” and was “far from the land” (Matt 14:24). In order to expand the plot, Matthew introduces a completely new tale. New content is also interpolated. Matthew will start up where Mark’s gospel left off when fresh content is introduced into these chapters. Matthew does not bother following the order of chapters 1 to 5 in Mark’s gospel but instead follows the order of chapters 6 and ahead in Mark’s gospel. As a result, Mark’s gospel has primacy and was the first to be written, as Matthew was acquainted with it (Muddiman & John 56). This could illustrate why Matthew does not worry about mentioning Mark until the 6th chapter when Mark presents his strongest spasm on the Torah.
Work Cited
Martin, Dale B. New Testament History and Literature. Yale University Press, 2012.
Muddiman, John, and John Barton, eds. The Gospels. Oxford University Press, 2010.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Directions
Choose just one of the two options below to complete this assignment.
Option A
Identify any historical purpose(s) behind the writing of Mark’s and Matthew’s Gospels. Include a reference to any historical factor mentioned in the recommended sources that may have triggered the writing of both Matthew’s and Mark’s Gospels and references to statements within both of the Gospels themselves. Class lesson material can be used in addition to the recommended sources. Include at least one historical factor and at least one reference to each Gospel studied. Restrict your resources to those below, any information within the course modules, and your text Portraits of Jesus. Be sure to distinguish between paraphrase and direct quotes. Type a 350-750 word paper using MLA formatting. Submit the completed assignment to the appropriate Assignment box by no later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT.
How and Why Matthew May Have Edited Marks Gospel
Resources for this paper relative to Mark’s Gospel:
See the ebook via SLU library: The Gospels of Jesus by Stanton (2002), pp. 48-53.
Resources for this paper relative to Matthew’s Gospel:
See the ebook via SLU library: The Gospels of Jesus by Stanton (2002), pp. 74-78.
See the ebook via SLU library: New Testament History and Literature by Martin (2012), pp. 93-107.
Resources for this paper relative to Mark’s Gospel:
See the ebook via SLU library: The Gospels by Barton and Muddiman (2010), Ch. 3.
Resources for this paper relative to Mark’s Gospel:
See the eBook via SLU library: The Gospel to The Romans: The Setting and Rhetoric of Mark’s Gospel Leiden: Brill, (2003), Ch. 5
Resources for this paper relative to Matthew’s Gospel:
See the eBook via SLU library: The Gospel of Matthew and Christian Judaism by T&T Clarke by Sim, David (1998), p. 113 and following
Option B
Explain how and why Matthew may have edited Mark’s Gospel. Use the following two sets of passages to support your claim.
According to course materials (Bible, textbook, digital materials linked below, etc.):
1. How and why would Matthew have edited Mark 6:45-52 contrasted with Matthew 14:25-27,32-33?
2. How and why would Matthew have edited Mark 9:2-10 contrasted with Matthew 17:1-13?
Be sure to distinguish between paraphrase and direct quotes. Type a 350-750 word paper using MLA formatting. Submit the completed assignment to the appropriate Assignment box by no later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT.