Group Dynamics- Exploring Implications and Challenges of Membership in Contemporary Society
The significance of groups and social relations in promoting the well-being of individuals underpins their necessity in society. With the evolution of technology, a paradigm shift has been evident, with people moving from conventional physical meetings to virtual or online encounters. The commonality of interests often forms the fabric for most social groups, with groups entailing people whose views are aligned in one way or another to a common objective. Various interests form the basis for various groups. Such interests are the defining factors in group orientations. This paper seeks to analyze the National Basketball Association community as an online social group that supports members of the NBA as well as their corporate social responsibilities as documented by (Archibald & Barnard, 2017).
The impacts of group membership on the individual group members greatly vary from one individual to another. Significant benefits have been realized among a majority of these group members. However, some of these group members have also experienced devastation. Group membership brings people together and has, in most instances, formed safe communities in which individuals receive psychosocial support (Vannucci & McCauley Ohannessian, 2019). By its design, groups often draw persons of similar interests. This alone confers considerable benefits by offering members a platform to which they can not only air their views but also help other members who may be needing the sorted health. The benefits of this social connection are evident with social well-being as the end result.
On the flip side, virtual groups can sometimes become a weapon for psychosocial deterioration. Some of these groups have been implicated in the passage of misinformation as well as misconceptions of some of the critical issues in society. This often leads to visible devastating effects that are sometimes felt at an individual level. Such effects include but are not limited to stress and anxiety. Peer influence among some of these social virtual groups has also been evident. This is particularly common among adolescents and younger adults. The consequence is usually seen in various psychosocial effects such as anger, hopelessness, and feelings of social withdrawal (Hammad & Alqarni, 2021). A virtual group thus maintains some levels of negative impacts, and cautious use is recommendable in some of these instances.
NBA care community being a social construct that is targeted at helping members of various communities around the world, its members are required to uphold its values in entirety. In this regard, these community members are therefore required to actively participate in its care programs. Several charity programs have been carried out by the NBA care community. Some of these programs’ initiation and rollout are funded by the NBA players, who are key members of this organization. This community also tailors its members to be elements of championing various critical societal issues (Giannoulakis & Drayer, 2016). Some of these issues supported and championed by the NBA community include racial justice and gender equality, among others.
Studies revealing the implications of NBA community membership, as well as the impact it has on society, often follow reporting from this organization. Such reports include the NBA’s annual reports and financial flow. These studies are systematic reviews that as well draw findings from the media on how various NBA players and teams contribute to the betterment of their societies. Additionally, individual accounts of how they have benefited from the NBA care efforts offer a good source of information on how the NBA impacts communities.
Whereas systematic reviews do give findings on a research problem, its utilization is often subject to several concerns. In the study involving the NBA care programs as their corporate social responsibilities, the methodology utilized has some strengths and weaknesses. The strength includes the presence of evidence, the availability of data relatable to the research question, and the vastness in coverage of the research. Some weaknesses, however, exist. Firstly, the data utilized in these studies are obtained from the individual franchise. This presents considerable difficulty since the authenticity of that data may be questionable, especially when data manipulation by a franchise arises. The validity of this data may as well be questionable due to the lack of a review board that is tasked with reviewing all reporting from NBA teams.
The study examining corporate social responsibility among NBA teams offers a better picture of how the NBA community impacts the societies around them. However, several issues remain unsettled within the entire NBA community that may require further research. Information utilizable by the study on social responsibility is dependent on the accounts of the individual franchise. To maintain validity and authenticity, an external review board is necessary. This may help pick up specific details that may turn to be a false representation of these reports. The utilization of media as sources of information may also represent particular difficulties. This is because the media tends to be biased when approaching some issues and may thus not give an accurate presentation of the same. These issues require further research, the rationale of which is to ensure the accuracy of reporting as a focus for actual determination of corporate social responsibility among the NBA community.
The NBA community, as a construct that draws members of the NBA, has a corporate social responsibility. Being a member of this community requires that their actions are aligned with the general values of the NBA. Members are thus required to be carriers of the general community dream and always express these values. The study examines the corporate social responsibilities of the NBA and aims to determine how this group impacts the societies around them. This study utilizes a systematic review drawing the accounts and reporting of the various NBA teams and communities.
References
Giannoulakis, C., & Drayer, J. (2016). “Thugs” versus “Good Guys”: The Impact of NBA Cares on Player Image. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9(4), 453-468. DOI: 10.1080/16184740903331796
Hammad, M., & Alqarni, T. (2021). Psychosocial effects of social media on the Saudi society during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0248811. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248811
Vannucci, A., & McCauley Ohannessian, C. (2019). Social Media Use Subgroups Differentially Predict Psychosocial Well-Being During Early Adolescence. Journal Of Youth And Adolescence, 48(8), 1469-1493. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-019-01060-9
Walzel, S., Robertson, J., & Anagnostopoulos, C. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility in Professional Team Sports Organizations: An Integrative Review. Journal Of Sport Management, 32(6), 511-530. DOI: 10.1123/jsm.2017-0227
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Order Instructions
Write 3-5 pages in which you critically review reliable media sources for information on the implications of membership in a chosen group or community. Examine both scholarly literature and reliable media sources to identify the problems, conflicts, and issues where additional research is needed.
Group Dynamics- Exploring Implications and Challenges of Membership in Contemporary Society
Introduction
Today, the focus of scientific inquiry is on group dynamics, the appeal of groups, the benefits and consequences of group membership, and how groups recruit members.
This assessment will delve into the characteristics and appeal of online groups and virtual communities. According to McKenna (2009) in Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace, “groups within the electronic realm share many characteristics in common with groups that meet and function in shared physical spaces” (p. 228). However, Brandon and Hollingshead (2009) say that “our collective notions of what constitutes a group have changed radically in the past 15 years” (p. 105).