Examination of Health Care Laws
Examination of Health Care Laws
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) plays a pivotal role in safeguarding individuals from genetic discrimination in employment and health insurance, ensuring the privacy of their genetic information. However, violations of GINA can occur, leading to legal ramifications for the organizations involved. The case of “Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Fabricut, Inc.” exemplifies the importance of adhering to GINA within the healthcare industry. To prevent future violations, hospitals must proactively establish robust data privacy measures, comprehensive policies, and regular training sessions for employees to uphold the principles of GINA and protect patients’ rights and privacy. The proactive implementation of data privacy measures, comprehensive policies, and employee training is essential for hospitals to ensure compliance with the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), thereby safeguarding patients’ rights and privacy in the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare regulations.
Analysis of Court Case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Fabricut, Inc.
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) is crucial for protecting people from genetic discrimination in employment and health insurance in the ever-changing landscape of healthcare regulations. Hospitals and healthcare facilities must comply with GINA to safeguard patients’ rights and privacy while upholding an inclusive and equitable work environment. Hospitals must adopt proactive efforts to stop future violations of this important regulation by establishing strong data privacy and security safeguards, developing thorough policies, and offering frequent training sessions.
Are you interested in obtaining an unpublished version of this copy or topic ? Get in touch with us. Our team of experts is ready to help.
State
A breach of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) is at issue in the case “Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Fabricut, Inc.”
Explain
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued the textile manufacturer Fabricut in the case “Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Fabricut, Inc.,” saying that Fabricut had violated the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA). A genetic mutation that enhanced the employee’s likelihood of developing a specific medical ailment led Fabricut to fire the worker, which gave rise to the case. The court decided in the EEOC’s favour, concluding that Fabricut’s behaviour amounted to genetic discrimination and a clear violation of GINA’s rules.
Support
Court Case Where a Health Care Law Violation Occurred
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) was broken in the legal case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Fabricut, Inc. Federal law forbids companies from discriminating against workers or job candidates based on their genetic information (1). This law is known as the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. Additionally, it forbids employers from asking for or obtaining genetic information unless specifically permitted.
Fabricut, Inc., a healthcare organization, was charged with breaking GINA when it demanded genetic testing from its employees so they could take part in the company’s wellness program (2). The genetic testing aimed to uncover potential health hazards in employees, but the corporation also utilized the results to make decisions about hiring. This action amounted to a violation of GINA, as the law strictly prohibits using genetic information in employment decisions, regardless of whether it reveals a potential health risk.
On behalf of the impacted workers, the EEOC, the federal agency in charge of implementing GINA, filed a case against Fabricut, Inc. The corporation’s forced genetic testing policy was considered a clear breach of GINA by the court, which ruled in favour of the EEOC (3). Fabricut, Inc. was consequently made to answer for its deeds and was subject to fines and corrective actions. This court case for healthcare administrators and organizations critically underscores the need to abide by healthcare rules like GINA. It highlights the necessity for healthcare institutions to create regulations safeguarding the rights and privacy of their staff and patients. By understanding and complying with healthcare laws, administrators can create a safe and ethical environment that upholds the rights of all individuals involved in the healthcare system.
Health Care Law That Was Violated In the Selected Case
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) was broken in the chosen case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Fabricut, Inc. GINA is a significant federal statute that was created to shield people against genetic discrimination in a variety of settings, including the workplace. GINA’s major goal is to prevent discrimination against people based on their genetic information, which includes data on genetic tests, genetic predispositions, and family medical history (4). This regulation is essential for protecting people’s rights and privacy, especially in the healthcare industry.
In the case of Fabricut, Inc., the violation occurred when the business enacted a requirement for genetic testing as part of its employee wellness program. Employees were subject to genetic testing as part of this policy, and the corporation used the results to make employment-related choices. Fabricut, Inc. violated GINA’s terms by requesting and using genetic information in their hiring operations. Using genetic information by employers in hiring, firing, promotion, or other employment-related decisions is legally forbidden.
The court’s decision in the EEOC’s favour emphasizes the gravity of GINA infractions and makes it abundantly obvious to other healthcare organizations that they must abide by this legislation. In addition to being unethical, violating GINA creates a space for genetic discrimination and could endanger people’s privacy. To guarantee that their organizations’ policies and procedures align with preserving people’s genetic information and rights, healthcare administrators must be knowledgeable about the provisions of GINA and other pertinent healthcare laws. Promoting fairness, equality, and moral behaviour in the healthcare sector depends on upholding these laws.
Implications of the Selected Law on the Health Care System
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), which aims to shield people from genetic discrimination in settings including employment and health insurance, has several effects on the healthcare system. Significant effects of this significant law are listed below:
Genetic Confidentiality and Privacy
GINA guarantees that a person’s genetic information is kept private and secure. This is vital in the health care system, where genetic testing and research are becoming increasingly common. GINA fosters trust between patients and healthcare providers by forbidding health insurers and employers from using genetic information to make decisions. This encourages people to get genetic testing and counselling without worrying about discrimination.
Equal Employment Opportunities
GINA’s regulations support equal employment chances for people with certain genetic traits. Employers are not permitted by law to use a person’s genetic information for hiring, firing, promotion, or any other aspect of employment. This helps ensure that employment decisions are focused on merit, abilities, and qualifications rather than genetic information, preventing discrimination against those who might have genetic markers for specific disorders.
Encouragement of Genetic Research
By allaying worries about potential discrimination, GINA promotes genetic research and testing. People are more willing to participate in clinical trials and research studies when they are certain their genetic information is secure. This increases the likelihood of expanding medical knowledge and creating individualized treatments for genetic disorders.
Compliance Issues
The need for adherence to the law’s requirements is one impact of GINA on the healthcare system. To avoid legal repercussions, healthcare companies must set up policies and procedures that adhere to GINA’s requirements. This can entail educating staff members, putting safeguards in place for genetic data, and ensuring that genetic data is handled correctly across the board. Non-compliance may result in pricey legal actions, penalties, and harm to the organization’s reputation.
In summary, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 has significant implications for the health care system. It promotes genetic privacy and confidentiality, equal employment opportunities, and access to health insurance. By encouraging genetic research and testing while imposing compliance challenges, GINA helps strike a balance between advancing medical knowledge and protecting individuals from genetic discrimination in the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare laws.
How the Hospital Should Protect Against another Violation
The hospital should create thorough policies and procedures that state that genetic information cannot be used to make choices about employment or health insurance. All employees, including managers and HR staff, should be informed of these policies so that everyone is aware of the requirements of GINA and the penalties for non-compliance. Regular training sessions should be held to inform staff members of the value of safeguarding genetic information and the potential repercussions of breaking GINA.
The hospital needs to put strong data privacy and security procedures in place, given the sensitive nature of genetic information. All genetic information should be kept in protected, encrypted databases only available to authorized staff. Access rules should be strictly enforced to prevent illegal reading or sharing of genetic information. Data handling processes should undergo routine audits to find and fix any possible weaknesses. The hospital should also nominate a designated privacy officer who will monitor adherence to GINA and other pertinent privacy regulations. By combining policy implementation, employee training, and strong data privacy measures, the hospital can significantly reduce the risk of GINA violations. This proactive approach will not only protect the rights and privacy of patients but also safeguard the hospital from legal repercussions and reputational damage associated with non-compliance.
Conclusion (Conclude)
In conclusion, hospitals must actively abide by the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 to safeguard patients’ rights and privacy. The proactive implementation of data privacy measures, comprehensive policies, and employee training is essential for hospitals to ensure compliance with the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), thereby safeguarding patients’ rights and privacy in the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare regulations. When combined with stringent data privacy and security controls, these proactive efforts can help create a reputable and moral healthcare institution that follows the GINA values while delivering high-quality care and protecting patients’ genetic information and privacy.
Sources
Ponomareva, D.V. (2022). Genetic Information in the Light of Genetic Discrimination: the Experience of Foreign States. Lex Genetica, 1(1), 56–62. https://lexgen.msal.ru/jour/article/view/6
CNE, K. S., PhD, MS, BSN. (2022). Fast Facts on Genetics and Genomics for Nurses: Practical Applications. In Google Books. Springer Publishing Company. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=s6JxEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA131&dq=Fabricut
Luong, A., Sprung, J. M., & Zickar, M. J. (2023). Personnel Psychology. In Google Books. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=k__KEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT6&dq=The+forced+genetic+testing+policy+of+the+corporation+was+considered+to+be+a+clear+breach+of+GINA+by+the+court
Rice, S. M., McLaren, R. A., Mustafa, H., Dugoff, L., & Al-Kouatly, H. B. (2023). Connecting the Dots: Carrier Screening and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act in the United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6405a:link {text-decoration: none;}a:visited {text-decoration: none;
}a:hover {text-decoration: underline;} a:active {text-decoration: underline;}
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Introduction
The health law field currently has undergone and will continue to undergo an enormous change. Among the multitude of challenges are legal implications that come with electronic health records (EHRs), payments based on patient outcomes, mergers, fraud, insurance disbursements, and antitrust laws—just to name a few. In addition, disruptive medical innovations, such as biotechnology and treatment research, have created new concerns over ethics and privacy.
Examination of Health Care Laws
To perform proficiently as a health care administrator, the current environment requires that you have an understanding of key health care laws such as the following:
Stark LawLinks to an external site.
HIPAA for ProfessionalsLinks to an external site.
HITECH Act Enforcement Interim Final RuleLinks to an external site.
Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA)Links to an external site.
A Roadmap for New Physicians: Fraud & Abuse Laws; Anti-Kickback StatuteLinks to an external site.
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008Links to an external site.
Instructions
In this assignment, imagine you work as an administrator in a hospital or healthcare organization. You are being considered for a promotion and are being asked to prepare a report for senior leadership that demonstrates your knowledge and interpretation of one of the above-mentioned healthcare laws.
To complete this report, do the following:
– Select a court case where one of these healthcare laws was violated.
– Write an analysis of the law and the selected case following the SESC formula: State, Explain, Support, and Conclude.
– Be sure to also address how organizational leadership in the selected court case could move forward to ensure that the health care law isn’t violated again in the future.
Your report should be at least five pages long and should include a title page and references, for a total of 7-8 pages.
Strayer Writing Standards
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Grading Criteria
The grading criteria for this report are as follows. It must include the elements listed below, so be sure to address each point. You may also want to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion in the Course Guide to see how your work will be assessed:
1. Analyze a court case where a healthcare law violation occurred.
2. Analyze the healthcare law that was violated in the selected case.
3. Evaluate the implications of the selected law on the health care system.
4. Recommend how the hospital should protect against another violation.
5. Support your thesis statement following the SESC formula (State, Explain, Support, and Conclude).
6. Use at least three peer-reviewed articles less than five years old.
7. Provide appropriate in-text citations and a reference section.
8. Meet clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.