Ethical Standpoint on Examination Malpractices Reflection
Introduction
Background of the study
This study assesses patients’ knowledge about high blood pressure and their use of hypertension medications. The study aims to see if people’s attitudes toward high blood pressure and the drugs used to treat it differ globally based on ethnicity or culture. The project aims to develop strategies that will improve medication adherence.
Do you need an original copy of “Ethical Standpoint on Examination Malpractices Reflection”? Reach us at eminencenursingpapers.com
The research topic is relevant to nursing. Nurses must rise to the challenge of diversity. They must network with others, talk with them, and inquire about the patient treatment administrations of other cultures and ethnicities. They encounter a barrier to being involved in treating a specific disease. On the other hand, administering different types of medical attention to various people suffering from the same condition and the assumption of these varying approaches is due to the patients’ racial/ethnic and cultural differences. As a result, research is critical for individuals who practice nursing. Also, the study would help nurses learn how to consider patients’ experiences with symptoms, even though it is not scientifically confirmed that such sensations exist. Yet, based on cultural norms and accepting the patients’ certainty systems, nurses should warn persons diagnosed with high blood pressure about air symptoms, even if the data is labeled inapt and those symptoms, as previously seen, did not associate with blood pressure instability.
According to the article, the nurse will recognize the importance of informing patients that their risk of hypertension has increased, regardless of whether symptoms are present or not, and that the only appropriate treatment will relieve the problems. The academic article’s primary goal is to comprehend patients’ perspectives and determine the reason for the low hypertension treatment. The study aims to discover why scholarly initiatives to educate patients about the dangers of cardiovascular disease have not shown results. Furthermore, the exercise is intended to inform readers of the development of evidence-based practice (which is better for controlling heart disorders such as high blood pressure).
Techniques of investigation
The writers conducted an organized review and a narrative mix of qualitative research on high blood pressure. They observed the lay perspectives on the causes of high blood pressure and the benefits of therapy. These authors expand their study to examine how sufferviewstives changed among cultures, races/ethnic groups. The research exercise is based on looking for and evaluating electronic databases. Relevant papers were investigatedassesseduated, and the exploration strategy included practical phrases for qualitative research with specific terms for high blood pressure.
They analyzed the patients’ perceptions of high blood pressure and drug use using in-person qualitative interviews and participants disseminated in peer-reviewed papers as illustrations. Phone interviews and statistical questionnaire evaluation were included. The study included patients with wituncomplicatedle hypertension. Those with existing cardiovascular disease were excluded from this group. This sampling strategy excluded expectant mothers. Reference materials published in other languages were used as samples because the researcher’s dialect was not a barrier, and translation methods were prepared for the study’s background.
The data was gathered and analyzed using the criteria endorsed by the ESRC (United Kingdom Economic and Social Research Council) study methodology guidelines. Following the methodology, systematic and reproducible procedures were used regarding narrative synthesis to promote transparency in distribution and assess the resourcefulness of the study findings/outcomes. Tabulations, textual summaries, and thematic analysis were used to summarize the findings. The researchers employed the one-sheet-paper technique, supplemented by textual summaries and the full text of articles. Deliberations and consensus were used to arrive at the final list of themes and their associations. As a result, full-text papers were created based on the existence or non-existence of the subject country and calculated by the government to determine cultural similarities and variances.
The findings of the study
As previously stated, stress, obesity and overweight, alcohol, dietary patterns, and family history/genetics were the primary causes of hypertension. According to the participants, stress has a significant role in hypertension and is the key culprit. One participant from Holland mistook anxiety and high blood pressure for the same thing. Job-related stress, financial stress, joblessness, and family worries were identified as barriers to blood pressure treatment, either directly or indirectly. Some individuals stated that stress was directly related to high blood pressure. The study included volunteers from sit countries who replaced hypertension medications with other alternatives and traditional remedies. This is because of prevailing cultural attitudes and habits.
The findings are applicable in the context of nursing. The nurse might use the study findings to determine the significance of treating patients from varied cultural/ethnic backgrounds. This article will aid nursing practitioners in deciding that due to a lack of notification and comprehension, patients willfully adjust the dosage and take medicine irregularly or discontinue hypertension medications. Nurses should offer hypertension patients pertinent information regarding the appropriate hypertension medications. Nurses might gain awareness by reading property studies. The nurse must consider and learn from patients’ experiences with symptoms, even if the symptoms are not scientifically validated. Based on the patients’ cultural systems, practitioners should notify hypertension patients regardless of their stated symptoms because this information is inappropriate and has been used in the past. Such data has not revealed any evidence of blood pressure instability levels.
The article is essential to nurses because it will help them realize the importance of informing patients that their risk of heart disease increases regardless of whether or not symptoms occur and that only the proper therapy may alleviate the problem. Practitioners can consider her a controllable or unmodifiable detrimental aspect contributing to hypertension. Again, nurses can utilize what they’ve learned from the research findings, which show that preventing and minimizing stress isn’t the sole way to keep blood pressure stable.
Factors for Ethical Behavior
The study relied on primary and secondary reference materials, such as electronic media assessment, and did not require ethical approval because the participants were only indirectly involved in the reserve.
Conclusion
This research study adhered to and followed a qualitative study work pattern. The data collection process was transparent, and the entire research technique was error-free. The research findings apply to nursingment since practitioners now understand the ethnic and cultural variances associated with hypertension therapy. This study is valuable information on why nurses should tell hypertension patients about the condition’s origination and whether they must take hypertension medications.
Similar Post: CLAS Standards
References
Marshall, I. J., Wolfe, C. D., & McKevitt, C. (2012). Lay perspectives on hypertension and drug adherence: a systematic review of qualitative research. Bmj, 345, e3953.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
For the oral presentation, briefly summarize your feelings about taking a course in Ethics and explore the transformation procession in this course.
Ethical Standpoint on Examination Malpractices Reflection
Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are now. Consider your interaction in discussions.
Should healthcare workers be required to take a course in Ethics? Why or why not
Presentation Requirements
Length: 2-3 minutes