Ethical and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care
As a guide to the moral frameworks of society, ethics is a critical component of modern society. It defines the set of behavior standards and principles that a community regards as reverent in expression. Spirituality, on the other hand, is an inner aspect of humanity that defines our social relationships with God. With the advancing contexts of healthcare delivery models that require critical decision-making systems, the two aspects are becoming increasingly important in modern society. Only by evaluating the prospects of ethics and spirituality in the modern world can one understand the relevance of such context from a worldview perspective (Welch, 2016).
When there are no clear structures in place, making medical decisions can become overwhelming. As a result, how we see ourselves as medical practitioners are influenced by the worldviews of various elements within the same scope. Every professional has a space of experience in the world bordering on spirituality and ethics. Some medical decisions necessitate a thorough understanding of the factors influencing professionals in their interactions with patients in community hospitals. Traditionalists and modernists in world systems indicate the variations of the world we live in today’s society, claiming massive deviations from the norms of our culture and heritage in aspects of prime realities in the health sectors indicate the variations on what God’s purpose is in the delivery charters. Such provisions not only depict a local understanding of how we relate to one another and the creator as one tends to deliver in such settings. Similarly, one must understand the characteristics of their surroundings, which have a significant impact on the position of health providers, as well as the predisposing factors that shape consumer behavior (Welch, 2016). Because everyone has a social background, we will embrace the diversity of cultural ethics as posited in the health field.
Furthermore, spirituality is a broad aspect of social life that involves multiple factors, such as the Supreme Being and human nature. Within the same system, professionals may be required to take critical steps to identify gaps in healthcare models. Some communities believe in spiritual connection to heal, whereas others generally believe in medical doctor contexts to recover. Such contentious issues necessitate critical decision-making abilities to assist us in understanding the best approach to the current challenges in the workplace. One of the most important aspects of such situations is the use of a collaborative approach to managing the structures of healthcare systems.
Ideally, the other worldview on ethics and spirituality on decisions in the health system involves concern about what would happen in our societies in the industry upon death. Supposed deaths in the medical fraternity may frighten relatives and friends of victims who require technical skills in operating community systems. Our decisions should be based on the effects it will have on healthcare systems rather than what current circumstances will be altered in the long run. Sometimes ethical considerations in decision-making may jeopardize the interest of some people in the same institutions in saving the life of a hospital patient. It would be beneficial for the public to understand the pillars of such considerations in health systems as we seek to strike a balance for long-term community operations.
The balance between what is right and wrong in spiritual and ethical contexts may present a major outline in which nurses and patients understand the environmental influence on the type of drugs to be administered to aid recovery. Everyone around the world may have differing perspectives on the contexts of private relationships with members of other backgrounds and perceive their contexts to be correct, while the audience may also have differing perspectives on the same issue. As a result, it would be appropriate to apply the factors outlined in the spiritual background and ethical provisions within such scopes of working environments.
To summarise, worldviews are critical in our understanding of our daily activities in society. Both ethical and spiritual frameworks are critical in challenging the scope of human thinking on a large scale when it comes to Medicare services. Worldviews serve as the foundation upon which humanity operates within various organizations. In making decisions in various departments, we must think before acting because medical errors can be costly if they occur. The cost of living in negligence may prevent the world from achieving its global health goals and pillars. These shifts in thinking envisioned in the contexts of spirituality and ethics are what define medical practice standards, transforming life on Earth into a beautiful experience enjoyed in modern settings.
References
Welch, S. D. (2016). Sweet dreams in America: Making ethics and spirituality work. Routledge.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Based on the required topic study materials, write a reflection about worldview and respond to the following:
In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective on the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to postmodern relativism in health care.
Ethical and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care
In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.
In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview: (a) What is ultimate reality? (b) What is the nature of the universe? (c) What is a human being? (d) What is knowledge? (e) What is your basis of ethics? (f) What is the purpose of your existence?
Remember to support your reflection with the topic study materials. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.
Rubric
Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear, and detailed, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject. The explanation is supported by the topic study materials.
The explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear and insightful. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.
Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with deep personal insight.
The thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. The thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
A clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
All format elements are correct.
·Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and the format is free of error.