Discussion – Healthcare Inequalities
The American healthcare framework is plagued with imbalances that lopsidedly affect ethnic minorities and other underestimated gatherings. These disparities add to gaps in health care insurance coverage, uneven access to services, and more unfortunate well-being results among specific populations. Some people endure the worst part of these medical services difficulties, especially the marginalized on racial grounds. Health inequality is a condition where patients experience discrimination in providing health services based on socioeconomic status (Dávila-Cervantes & Agudelo-Botero, 2019). Socioeconomic status is a concept stratifying individuals according to their social and cultural inclinations and their level of economic outcomes. In this regard, disparities in the American healthcare system are portrayed by favoring patients in need of the same medical services. Those with good socioeconomic status are visited first and receive better quality of care than patients with poor socioeconomic status who consult slowly and receive poor quality of care.
Focusing on health inequalities and the need for revitalization based on the Harvard forum, we comprehend how avoiding the health team’s nature contributes to visible inequalities. When patients’ workload increases compared to that of health workers (doctors and nurses), the health care practitioners begin to ignore the patient’s condition and degrade towards the low quality of care (Harvard University, 2016). It is an unethical practice carried out by healthcare workers in healthcare facilities that results in a deterioration of the patient’s health. Creating unfair differences between patients is also highlighted in the forum where health workers delay services to patients because of their social status (Harvard University, 2016). In learning and practice, nurses are believed to be forefront fighters to sustain human life at all costs in any healthcare setting. In this case, health workers delay service to patients because of their social status.
For example, when a VIP patient (a very important person) arrives at the hospital, the healthcare team shifts focus to that person. As a result, the provision of care to patients from lower social status is debilitated, thereby affecting care quality. This form of negligence and ignorance causes detrimental effects, including long-term effects or even death to other patients.
Distinguishing patients based on skin color is also the dominant type of health inequality. For example, if a health care professional does not accompany a black patient to Puskiesma, but when the patient comes to Puskiesma, only special, patient-centered care is offered based on the difference in skin color. There is ample evidence to suggest that even though the United States spends more on health care, Americans are not regularly getting the attention they need. Patients with persistent disease, high blood pressure, coronary artery disease, and diabetes very often do not receive proven and feasible treatment, such as medication or administration, to treat their disease better (Newman & Kjervik, 2016). The major disruption to the health framework is not surprising given that healthcare providers do not have guaranteed inputs or the tools they must provide and cooperate cooperatively to improve significantly.
There is a need to continue health insurance programs, assist medical facilities with essential equipment, and improve health response services to stimulate emergency situations. Changing our framework for the transfer of medical services to improve the quality and ranking of care is critical to increasing costs, lowering quality, and increasing the number of Americans without health insurance. Such changes should increase acceptance of the ideal reflection at the ideal time with the right mindset. You need to take care of the health of the individual and prevent the normal and inevitable attachment of diseases as far as possible. Appropriately structured changes would support a more visible recognition of well-being than the current framework that energizes insignificant and even pessimistically dangerous tests, methods, and drugs.
References
Dávila-Cervantes, C. A., & Agudelo-Botero, M. (2019). Health inequalities in Latin America: persistent gaps in life expectancy. The Lancet Planetary Health, 3(12), e492-e493.
Harvard University. (2016, April 22). Health care inequalities in America: The need for continuing reform [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Nychm8M7uyM
Newman, A. B., & Kjervik, D. K. (2016). Critical care nurses’ knowledge of confidentiality legislation. American Journal of Critical Care, 25(3), 222-227.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Based on viewing the Johnson & Johnson video, what are your thoughts about healthcare inequalities and the need for continuing reform? (Share at least 2 points of view.)
Health Care Inequalities
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style, with support from at least two academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.