Different Views of the Administration of Justice in America
One point of view of the criminal justice system is that it is a process. A process is a series of steps taken in a specific order that eventually leads to a specific end. Considering the criminal justice system using the process perspective, the first step is committing a crime; then, one can predict the next step (Peak, 1998). For example, if the criminal is arrested, the next step, if a complaint is filed, will be detention while awaiting trial. However, if the criminal is arrested, then they remain at large. If the criminal is taken to trial, tried, and found guilty (Peak, 1998), they could be sent to jail and released on bail, probation, or imprisonment. Viewing the criminal justice administration as a process means that every reaction brings out a specific reaction. Any failures in the administration can be attributed to a specific point in the process.
The second perspective of the criminal justice administration is that it is a network. Accordingly, this point of view states that all the elements within the criminal justice system cooperate and share mutual goals; some guidelines ensure equality and fair treatment for everyone (Peak, 1998). Additionally, any person accused of a crime is given their rights, especially that of being presumed innocent until proven guilty. Lastly, every person is given a speedy public trial before an unbiased jury and is represented by a competent lawyer. However, this perspective is flawed because the elements within the criminal justice system are known to compete with each other, especially for funding; secondly, most minorities are not treated fairly in the criminal justice system (Peak, 1998).
The last perspective of the criminal justice system is that of a non-system. In this view, the criminal justice system comprises three elements: law enforcement, judiciary, and corrections (Adler & Laufer, 2013). These elements are entangled, but sometimes they do not work in harmony. In addition, the system is inefficient because its punishment methods do not entirely discourage crime. This view paints the criminal justice system as a big, disenfranchised, unruly muddle, which seems to work but is close to a major collapse.
References
Adler, F., & Laufer, W. S. (Eds.). (2013). The Criminology of Criminal Law. Transaction Publishers.
Peak, K. J. (1998). Justice administration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Compare and contrast the different views of the administration of justice in the United States as a non-system, a network, and a process.
Different Views of the Administration of Justice in America