Criminal Justice System – Case of Mary Lee Smith
Should Mary Lee be sent to prison or allowed to remain on probation?
For petty crimes, it is reasonable for a convict to serve probation as a method of rehabilitation. Mary Lee was given a chance at probation to rectify her behavior, possibly for the sake of her children. However, her behavior has persisted, and the community is fed up with her misdemeanor. Therefore, it would be a reasonable punishment for Lee to be incarcerated for a time in an attempt to correct her behavior. Once deprived of her freedom, Lee might consider reforming through training in a correctional facility.
Is there anything else you can do as a probation officer to help Mary Lee make a more successful adjustment regarding living within the limits of the law?
Education is important for every individual in the present times. Lee had a limited educational background that limited her vision of a career and an opportunity to be productive and obtain a substantial source of income. As Lee’s probation officer, I would recommend she further her education and identify with a career choice that she would be pleased practicing. Mostly, a job function that is focused on service delivery and interaction with the public would help understand other people’s perspectives. Through interactions, people can appreciate other people’s feelings and concerns.
Is it enough for the courts or society to tell someone like Mary Lee not to commit petty larceny, or does our system have a moral duty to provide her with support services that could increase her chance of success?
It is the collective responsibility of every citizen to uphold the law. The law is established to promote peace and harmonious coexistence. However, there exists a disparity in attitudes and thinking patterns among citizens attributable to different socioeconomic statuses. Society can promote a way of discouraging recidivism through proper education on the short and long-term effects of petty larceny on the victim and perpetrator. Also, severe repercussions would serve as a means of discouraging people from involvement in criminal activities. The severity of consequences is a sure strategy for ensuring law and order are maintained.
References
Whitehead, P. (2016). Transforming probation: Social theories and the criminal justice system. Policy Press.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Criminal Justice System – Case of Mary Lee Smith
Write a 1/2 to one page (150–275 words) response in which you answer the three questions that follow the case study below:
You could have been in the same situation yourself. Instead, it is Mary Lee Smith, one of your probationers, who is about to stand before the judge in a probation revocation hearing.
When you and your husband split 10 years ago, you had two children and eventually had to declare bankruptcy and accept food stamps to be able to pay the rent. After seven years working as a secretary at the nearby state juvenile corrections center, receiving constant encouragement from Mrs. Jones, the superintendent, and taking advantage of a criminal justice scholarship program, you finished a degree in administration of justice and qualified for an entry-level position with the community resources division of the state department of corrections. You advanced as the system grew, and now, three years later, you are a probation supervisor in Judge Longworth’s court.
In a way, Mary Lee is as much a victim as she is an offender. Married at seventeen, she quit high school and moved west with her husband, who was in the army. By the time she was twenty, she had two children and was divorced. With babysitters to pay and skills that would command no more than minimum wage, Mary Lee turned to such income supplements as shoplifting, bad check writing, and occasionally prostitution. Her check-passing skills developed rapidly, and it was not long before she had amassed a series of convictions, not to mention several lesser offenses for petty larceny that were disposed of by the prosecutor’s declaration of nolle prosequi. To date, Mary Lee has not served a day in prison. Judge Longworth has used admonition, restitution, suspended sentence, and probation to rehabilitate Mary Lee. However, Mary Lee’s criminal conduct has persisted, as has her inability to stretch her food stamps, welfare payments, and part-time minimum-wage employment into a satisfactory existence for herself and her children. To complicate the matter, the welfare safety net that had helped keep Mary Lee and her children afloat would cease to exist for her within 24 months.
Judge Longworth has called you into his chambers before the hearing. He read your violation report with interest. You pointed out Mary Lee’s family obligations and the imminent possibility that the children would have to be placed in foster homes if she were confined. You also pointed out that she has been faithful in making restitution and that she maintains a steady church relationship and a good home environment for her children. Although your report is fair and accurate, you realize that the judge has sensed your misgivings and uncertainty concerning Mary Lee.
Judge Longworth looks up from your report and comes directly to the point. “Do you really believe this woman deserves to go back into the community? You certainly seem to have found some redeeming features in her conduct that I don’t,” he says. “Unfortunately, it appears to me that the only way she is going to learn to respect other people’s property is to be deprived of her own freedom. I think the community is getting pretty tired of this kind of repetitive criminal conduct.” Judge Longworth looks to you expectantly for an answer.
You are on the spot. You know your answer might put Mary Lee in the penitentiary or give her another chance on probation. The judge will make up his own mind, but you know he values your opinion.
Should Mary Lee be sent to prison or allowed to remain on probation?
Is there anything else you can do as a probation officer to help Mary Lee make a more successful adjustment regarding living within the limits of the law?
Is it enough for the courts or society to tell someone like Mary Lee not to commit petty larceny, or does our system have a moral duty to provide her with support services that could increase her chance of success?s