Creativity and Innovation
The question of whether creativity is nature or nurture is one that has been debated for centuries. Some claim that creativity and innovation are determined by one’s biological composition; for example, Reuter, Roth, Holve, & Hennig (2006) claim that there are dopamine-associated genes that account for a person’s creativity. Another theory that supports creativity by nature is founded on the idea that a person’s brain structure determines creativity, as stated by Jauk, Neubauer, Dunst, Fink, & Benedek (2015). However, creativity by nature or chance has weak evidence, is unreliable, and is still in its infancy stages (Zhou, 2018).
In a book titled Explaining Creativity, the author, Keith Sawyer, clearly dispels the popular myths surrounding creativity and explains that the process of creativity and innovation happens through hard work. Some myths that Sawyer dispels include the links between creativity and illness, socially awkward people, and the idea that creativity is a trait. In addition, numerous studies have demonstrated that creativity is gained through education and training, which eventually results in structural and functional plasticity in the brain (Vartanian, 2013). Research on the effect of training and education on the brain shows that a person’s neural activities and attentional techniques are moldable through intervention. Therefore, creativity does not just happen; rather, an individual must put in the work of preparation, which could take up a lot of time. For instance, a pastry chef does not just come up with a recipe without the experience of how different flavors taste and how they can mix and bring out a new and great taste. In conclusion, creativity does not just happen by chance; even if there is a biological link to it, it must be fostered through education, training, experience, and hard work.
References
Jauk, E., Neubauer, A. C., Dunst, B., Fink, A., & Benedek, M. (2015). Gray matter correlates of creative potential: A latent variable voxel-based morphometry study. NeuroImage, 111, 312-320.
Reuter, M., Roth, S., Holve, K., & Hennig, J. (2006). Identification of first candidate genes for creativity: a pilot study. Brain research, 1069(1), 190-197.
Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press.
Vartanian, O. (2013). 12 Fostering Creativity: Insights from Neuroscience. Neuroscience of creativity, 257.
Zhou, K. (2018). What cognitive neuroscience tells us about creativity education: A literature review. Global Education Review, 5(1), 20-34.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Debate and Defend or Refute: A leader’s ability to be creative and innovation is the result of chance rather than hard work.
Creativity and Innovation
Provide a basis for your position.