Article with a Therapeutic Approach

Article with a Therapeutic Approach

Overview of the Selected Article

Population under Consideration

            The selected article, titled “Couple and Family Therapy for Substance Use Disorders: Evidence-Based Update 2010–2019,” offers an extensive review of therapeutic interventions for individuals and families struggling with addictive disorders. The population under examination in the selected publication, “Couple and Family Therapy for Substance Use Disorders: Evidence-Based Update 2010-2019,” comprises both people and families impacted by SUD (Hogue et al., 2021). The article systematically summarizes previous reviews and recent studies, establishing the efficacy of systemic family therapy as a stand-alone treatment and emphasizing the potential efficacy of behavioral family therapy and behavioral couple therapy, particularly when used as part of a comprehensive treatment approach for addictive disorders. The study also delves into the practical considerations and challenges of implementing these therapeutic interventions, as well as potential future directions for incorporating couple and family therapy into routine systems of care for individuals and families dealing with SUD.

The Specific Intervention That Was Used

Systemic family therapy, behavioral family therapy, and behavioral couple therapy are among the specific methods described in the selected article for treating addiction illnesses. These therapies are not new, but they have been studied and evaluated in the context of substance use disorders. The article provides an evidence-based update on their efficacy, confirming that systemic family therapy is well-established as a stand-alone treatment, whereas behavioral family therapy and behavioral couple therapy are considered possibly efficacious as stand-alone treatments and well-established when used in conjunction with other treatments.

The Author’s Claims

Based on their evaluation of data on therapeutic approaches for substance use disorders (SUD), the authors of the selected article make many statements. First, they assert that systemic family therapy is a well-established stand-alone treatment for SUD. Behavioral family therapy and behavioral couple therapy are likely effective as stand-alone treatments and well-established when combined in a full multicomponent treatment plan (Newman et al., 2022). Furthermore, the paper argues that there is a considerable body of data supporting the use of family-based and couple-based treatment approaches for SUD, providing hope to people seeking assistance in the setting of addiction. Finally, the authors offer practice guidelines and recommendations for putting these interventions into action.

The Findings of the Study in the Article

The findings of the selected study stress the efficacy of several therapeutic approaches for treating substance use disorders, such as systemic family therapy, behavioral family therapy, and behavioral couple therapy. A considerable amount of evidence supports these interventions, with systemic family therapy regarded well-established as a stand-alone treatment and the other two as possibly efficacious, particularly when integrated into comprehensive treatment regimens. Family and marital therapy can be beneficial in the treatment of addictive illnesses (Kourgiantakis et al., 2021). In my own practice, I would consider incorporating family and couple therapy into the treatment plan for individuals suffering from substance use disorders, acknowledging the potential benefits of involving family members and partners in the therapeutic process to provide holistic support and address the broader dynamics that contribute to addiction. This method may benefit clients by increasing their social support networks and addressing underlying family-related difficulties that contribute to their addiction. However, the decision to apply such interventions should always be personalized, taking into account each client’s specific circumstances and preferences, as not all clients may benefit or be open to family or couple therapy.

Impact of the Limitations of the Study to Use the Findings Presented In the Article

The study’s shortcomings, as mentioned in the article, may have an impact on the practical application of its findings in clinical practice. One restriction could be the results’ generalizability to different populations or individual client scenarios. The study may have concentrated on specific demographic groups or circumstances that do not adequately represent the range of individuals seeking treatment for substance use disorders. This may limit the findings’ relevance to a broader spectrum of customers, particularly those with distinct cultural, social, or clinical characteristics. Practitioners should exercise caution when applying these findings to clients whose profiles and backgrounds differ markedly from those investigated.

Another potential drawback is the research’s time frame. The evidence is updated from 2010 to 2019 because the field of addiction therapy is always evolving. Since then, new therapy approaches and studies may have arisen, perhaps offering additional or alternative strategies for managing substance use problems. Clinicians should stay up to date on the newest discoveries in the field and evaluate the changing landscape of addiction treatment to give the most current and effective care (Martinez Leal et al., 2022). While the findings of the paper are valuable, they should be combined with current information and customized to particular client needs, taking into account any recent breakthroughs in addiction therapy.

Why Each Supporting Source Is Considered Scholarly

1. Psychotherapeutic treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: Cognitive and behavioral therapies, enhancement strategies, and emerging efforts.

This source is considered scholarly because it was published in the prestigious peer-reviewed academic journal “Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics,” which is known for publishing high-quality research in the field of neurotherapeutics and related fields. Second, the writers’ names and qualifications are mentioned, indicating their knowledge in the fields of psychology and therapy and so meeting the criteria for authorship by subject-matter experts. Furthermore, the source is likely to include citations and references to past research, which is frequent in scholarly papers and shows that the authors are engaging with the existing academic literature on the subject.

2. Collaborative learning: A qualitative study exploring factors contributing to a successful tobacco cessation train-the-trainer program as a community of practice.

This source is considered scholarly because it was published in the reputable, peer-reviewed academic journal “International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,” which is known for publishing research topics. Furthermore, the article offers particular characteristics such as a volume and issue number, which is usual in scholarly publications and helps readers discover and cite the source. Finally, including a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) provides a permanent connection to the publication, making it easier to access and cite.

3. Family-Focused Practices in Addictions: A Scoping Review.

This source is regarded as scholarly because it was published in the “Journal of Social Work Practice in Addictions,” a reputable peer-reviewed academic journal devoted to research in the field of social work and addiction practices. Second, the writers’ names and affiliations are mentioned, indicating their competence and involvement in scholarly study in the subject area. Furthermore, the source offers volume and issue numbers, which are customary in scholarly journals and make it easy for readers to discover and credit the piece. Another evidence of the source’s scholarly nature is the availability of a DOI, which provides a permanent connection for access and reference.

References

Hogue, A., Schumm, J. A., MacLean, A., & Bobek, M. (2021). Couple and family therapy for substance use disorders: Evidence‐based update 2010–2019. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12546

Kourgiantakis, T., Ashcroft, R., Mohamud, F., Fearing, G., & Sanders, J. (2021). Family-focused practices in addictions: A scoping review. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 21(1), 18–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256x.2020.1870287

Martinez Leal, I., Martinez, J., Britton, M., Chen, T. A., Correa-Fernández, V., Kyburz, B., Nitturi, V., Obasi, E. M., Drenner, K., Williams, T., Casey, K., Carter, B. J., & Reitzel, L. R. (2022). Collaborative learning: A qualitative study exploring factors contributing to a successful tobacco cessation train-the-trainer program as a community of practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137664

Newman, M. G., Basterfield, C., Erickson, T. M., Caulley, E., Przeworski, A., & Llera, S. J. (2022). Psychotherapeutic treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: cognitive and behavioral therapies, enhancement strategies, and emerging efforts. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2022.2125800

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

---

Choose a recent academic research article that discusses a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.
• Provide an overview of the article you selected.
o What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?
o What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that has already been studied?
o What were the author’s claims?
• Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own clients. If so, how? If not, why?
• Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
• Support your response with at least three other peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly.