Site icon Eminence Papers

Analyzing Rhetorical Appeals- Logos, Ethos, and Pathos in The Benefits of Renewable Energy

Analyzing Rhetorical Appeals- Logos, Ethos, and Pathos in The Benefits of Renewable Energy

The issue of age-gap relationships has long been seen as taboo or looked down upon. More so, the issue has become perverse as society becomes more accepting of same-sex relationships. In Parkinson’s article, she articulates what society deems wrong with age-gap relationships in the view of arguing against the ‘taboo’ outlook on relationships. Borne, out of her article, below are some of the identified appeals within the article and their consequent application by Parkinson. Hire our assignment writing services in case your assignment is devastating you.

Ethos

As a supporter of age-gap relationships, Hannah Jane Parkinson explains to the audience her own attraction to older partners. Hannah notes that she is more drawn to older people due to their intellectualism. She also offers that due to the life experiences of older people, she finds older people to have interesting conversations (Parkinson, 2015). Parkinson further offers that sex is better, too. One can note that Parkinson’s credibility is relative to her support of age-gap relationships. She does not advocate for the same and, thereof, the mitigation of society’s taboo mindset, but she also practices the same. This shows her credibility in advocating for age-gap relationships.

Pathos

In discussing the topic of age-gap relationships, one can note that the author lends both the supportive and objective aspects of the topic. She begins by, first of all, offering the objective ideas of the topic ahead of hers, supportive. This way, the audience can note that the author, Parkinson, 2015, is not impartial and is not swayed by her emotions on the topic. Thus, one can easily note how Parkinson has utilized pathos as a rhetorical appeal to rouse the interest of individuals on the issue under scope by evoking their emotions on the same.

Logos

Parkinson notes how people object to age-gap relationships based on the reasoning that the individuals are at different stages of their lives. However, Parkinson (2015) goes ahead to note that the maturity of an individual cannot be noted on their age. She does this by giving an explanation of how men clad in suits are most likely to be watching a spoof video as that being watched by a kid on a bus. The narration and the whole idea of Parkinson (2015), as articulated above, are based on a voice of reason and logic. It helps to show that age is not the determining factor of relationships as has been initially perceived with maturity or different stages of life for individuals.

References

Parkinson, H. J. (2015). Stephen Fry’s engagement: what’s wrong with age-gap relationships? The Guardianhttps://www.theguardian.com/culture/2015/jan/06/stephen-fry-engagement-eliot-spencer-whats-wrong-with-age-gap-relationships

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question 


Click the link below to watch a video identifying logos, ethos, and pathos in written works.

Analyzing Rhetorical Appeals- Logos, Ethos, and Pathos in The Benefits of Renewable Energy

Then post the link to any persuasive article of your choice, explaining how these three rhetorical appeals are used.

Exit mobile version