Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue: Medication Errors
Medication errors are one of the most persistent challenges in healthcare, posing significant risks to patient safety and leading to preventable harm, prolonged hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. This analysis explores medication errors, building on prior research to examine their causes, affected populations, potential solutions, and ethical implications. A technology-driven, multidisciplinary approach is proposed as the most effective solution, ensuring adherence to ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice: Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue: Medication Errors.
Elements of the Problem/Issue
Medication errors occur at all stages of the medication process—prescribing, dispensing, and administration. The World Health Organization estimates that 1.5 million adverse drug events are preventable in the United States only, and they have a serious effect on patient safety, healthcare organizations, and healthcare systems (Tsegaye et al., 2020). Some of the weaknesses include misuse of drugs, prescribing the wrong dosages, drug interactions, and inadequate effective communication, particularly during shift changes.
These errors may stem from system factors and other person-related factors, like insufficient staff, increased workload, and poor communication. These challenges still occur because of poor implementation, resistance to change, and lack of communication between decision-makers, computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems, and barcode medication administration (BMA) technologies.
Medication errors are related to all healthcare workers, particularly nurses, doctors, and pharmacists, as medication errors ultimately affect patients’ trust in their healthcare providers. Errors not only lead to physical harm but also erode the professional confidence of healthcare providers and the overall quality of care.
Analysis
Context of the Problem
Pharmaceutical mistakes are most common in the health care systems where time-sensitive processes are excessively time-consuming and stressful for healthcare providers such as hospitals and emergency departments. For example, the patient handover from one department to another is a safety-sensitive time when poor communication or inadequate sign-over can result in adverse events. Moreover, cultural, language, or cognitive barriers to health decision-making also predispose such a group as patients with low health literacy to such errors.
Importance of the Problem
The Medication Dispensing Improvements reflect the fact that medication errors are not limited to harm to patients. They incur more costs since patients take longer to receive treatment in hospitals, undergo other forms of treatment, and may also face legal implications. These errors also diminish patient confidence in the health care system and thus are catastrophic. As a nurse, I have witnessed firsthand how simple lapses in communication during shift changes can lead to severe consequences, underscoring the need for robust systemic safeguards.
Affected Groups
The impact of medication errors spans multiple groups. To begin with, patients face immediate physical and emotional harm, including longer recovery periods and financial strain. Second, for healthcare professionals, errors can lead to legal consequences, reduced morale, and cause professional reputational damage.
Third, regarding healthcare systems, institutions bear increased operational costs, reduced efficiency, and potential damage to their reputation. For instance, this model would prove helpful in oncology, where medication dosage requires great accuracy. A minor mistake in this sensitive area can cause dire consequences; therefore, it is high time this problem was resolved on all scales.
Considering Options
Several strategies can mitigate medication errors.
Technological Interventions
BMA and computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems include check features to minimize prescription and administration blunders. Appropriate systems implement real-time verifications for these processes, which substantially minimizes the risk inherent in manual work.
Simulation-Based Training
Simulation-based learning applied to the education of healthcare professionals increases their ability and assurance on the usage of medication (Elendu et al., 2024). Such training activities involve similar conditions to real-life scenarios; hence, the staff is best placed to handle any mistake and further prevent similar occurrences.
Structured Communication Protocols
Promoting structure in terms of handover processes and adopting double-check processes reduces the chances of a lack of coordination (Ghosh et al., 2021). They also help maintain the flow of information during shift and patient handover and effectively prevent information errors.
Medication Reconciliation
This process helps to facilitate the sharing of complete and accurate information regarding a patient’s medications when they are transferring from one care setting to the next. Notably, medication reconciliation carried out by pharmacists can reduce errors, especially during the admission and discharge of patients (Ghosh et al., 2021).
Interdisciplinary Collaboration
The physician, nurses, and pharmacists should take charge of medication safety by collaborating with other active participants. Thus, the team synergy is on the identification of risks and the subsequent corrective actions once they have been ascertained.
Failure to adopt these solutions will result in continuance of avoidable harm, rising costs, and reduced confidence in care facilities. Applying these strategies means using an integrative approach that involves the use of new technologies, strong training, and well-developed workflows. It also requires significant organizational commitment for leadership to properly promote the culture of safety in healthcare organizations.
Solution
The solution proposed is all-inclusive and incorporates the use of technological tools, staff training, and enhanced communication protocols. The superimposition of CPOE and BMA systems with pharmacist-involved medication reconciliation creates multiple redundancies in the system to decrease errors in medication. In doing so, every step of the process related to medication—from prescribing to administration—becomes well verified. Also, the pharmacist-led review during transitions of care strengthened safeguards against errors, especially during risky transitions in care, such as admission and discharge from a hospital.
Another critical element of the solution would be simulation-based training. The aim of this training is for health professionals to truly apply advanced technologies and follow evidence-based protocols in reality. The more health workers hone error-prevention techniques in simulated conditions, the greater their aptitude and assurance in consistently managing high standards of patient safety will become.
Pros
The proposed approach will have several advantages. Automation through technological tools may significantly reduce the likelihood of human error, with real-time verification of medication details such as dosage and patient identity. Improved quality and reliability of clinical information also improves decision-making that facilitates the provision of efficient and timely services.
The extent of reconciliation processes also enhances the safety of patients during transitions of care to a greater extent. In addition, they are beneficial in enhancing the efficiency of operations by eliminating issues that are not useful and enabling healthcare providers to focus on aspects that would directly impact a patient.
Cons
The high upfront implementation costs can be an obstacle for health facilities with inadequate funding. Resistance from staff unfamiliar with new systems may impede smooth adoption. Periodical system breakdowns, for instance, system malfunctions, can also be experienced at some point, and therefore, there should be an avenue to continue offering care. Sustaining such systems for longer periods to achieve long-term results increases the cost of operating such systems and thus places a strain on healthcare institutions.
In addition, this multi-faceted solution requires the involvement of all stakeholders, including healthcare leaders, IT professionals, and frontline staff. Notably, implementation plans of these different programs require detailed training programs to be in place so that transitions between the current practices and the enhanced ones will be effective and continually monitored to assess the efficacy of the solutions implemented and cyclically improve them.
Ethical Implications
Beneficence and Nonmaleficence
The developed solution complies with the beneficence principle because the decision is made to enhance patient safety and the quality of care. It also complies with respect for nonmaleficence, where it can minimize avoidable harm through existing vigorous error-prevention measures.
Autonomy
Ensuring accurate medication information and obtaining informed consent respect patient autonomy. For instance, the precise notifications about some modifications in taking medications promote patients’ knowledge about their treatment. Technologies such as BMA systems ensure that the right medication is given to patients at the right time, hence boosting their confidence in the system.
Justice
The solution directs justice by guaranteeing the provision of appropriate safeguard practices within the medication processes, especially for fairly understood sections of the community like the elderly or those with conditions such as dementia. The provision of a mix of measures increases the safety of patients without regard to their economic or demographic status.
Implementation
Effective implementation of the proposed solution involves the following steps.
Stakeholder Engagement
Engage the management and technical support in the organization alongside staff-based care providers in order to overcome possible resistance. Interdisciplinary makes it possible to embrace multiple ideas on how to design and deploy a better system.
Training and Education
Offer a comprehensive package on sharpening the skills in efficient use of CPOE, BMA systems, and communication patterns. Improvement of Professional Practice programs must be maintained so that staff stays informed of current implementation procedures and technological advancements.
Monitoring and Feedback
To measure the effectiveness of the solution, standards must be set, including error rates and staff compliance. As such, constant meetings can become an effective measure for the detection of such problems and possible improvements.
Integration of Technology
CPOE and BMA systems should be implemented in a way that they can blend well with the existing systems. These are pilot tests and changes in the system depending on the feedback received from the user.
Policy Development
Developing clear policies and protocols is essential in guiding the use of these technologies and practices. Additionally, regular update policies are important so as to reflect on advancements and lessons learned from implementation.
Data privacy and security issues should not be overlooked when implementing the plans. To protect patients’ confidential data, role-based access control, data encryption, and policy audit can be employed (Nasiri et al., 2021).
Conclusion
Medication errors continue to account for considerable morbidity and mortality in healthcare, though recent research has identified plausible solutions. To eliminate possible as well as confirmed blunders, and ensure patients’ safer care about their rights to privacy and secrecy, healthcare organizations should adopt and expand the use of technology, improve internal and external communications, and provide continued education. Moreover, some of the standard ethical principles to be embraced in the implementation process include beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Solving this problem requires people, money, and willingness to change; however, it is impossible to overestimate the advantages of making the process of caring for patients safer and more effective.
References
Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Okatta, A. U., Amaechi, E. C., Elendu, T. C., Ezeh, C. P., & Elendu, I. D. (2024). The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine, 103(27), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038813
Ghosh, S., Ramamoorthy, L., & pottakat, B. (2021). Impact of structured clinical handover protocol on communication and patient satisfaction. Journal of Patient Experience, 8(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373521997733
Nasiri, E., Lotfi, M., Mahdavinoor, S. M. M., & Rafiei, M. H. (2021). The impact of a structured handover checklist for intraoperative staff shift changes on effective communication, or team satisfaction, and patient safety: A pilot study. Patient Safety in Surgery, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-021-00299-1
Tsegaye, D., Alem, G., Tessema, Z., & Alebachew, W. (2020). Medication administration errors and associated factors among nurses. International Journal of General Medicine, 13(13), 1621–1632. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s289452
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question
Assessment 4: Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue
Write a 4-6 page analysis of a current problem or issue in health care, including a proposed solution and possible ethical implications.
Introduction
In your health care career, you will be confronted with many problems that demand a solution. By using research skills, you can learn what others are doing and saying about similar problems. Then, you can analyze the problem and the people and systems it affects.
You can also examine potential solutions and their ramifications. This assessment allows you to practice this approach with a real-world problem.
Instructions
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
- Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 and provide details about it.
- As you describe the topic you explored in Assessment 2, use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking. This approach was introduced in Assessment 2.
- Identify possible causes for the problem or issue.
- Use scholarly information to describe and explain the health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it.
- Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic.
- You may find the How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide helpful in locating appropriate references.
- You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2 or you may search the Capella library for other articles.
- You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide helpful in your search.
- Review the Think Critically About Source Quality to help you complete the following:
- Assess the credibility of the information sources.
- Assess the relevance of the information sources.
- Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic.
- Analyze the health care problem or issue.
- Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue.
- Describe why the problem or issue is important to you.
- Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.
- Provide examples that support your analysis of the problem or issue.
- Discuss potential solutions for the health care problem or issue.
- Describe what would be required to implement a solution.
- Describe potential consequences of ignoring the problem or issue.
- Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing.
- Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
- Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
- Explain the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.
- Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.
Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue: Medication Errors
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
- Assessment 4 Example [PDF] (Attached)
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
- Length: 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
- Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
- APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
- Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
- Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
- References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper.
- APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
Organize your paper using the following structure and headings:
- Title page. A separate page.
- Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper.
- Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the problem or issue or question.
- Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue.
- Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or answers.
- Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer.
- Ethical implications. Ethical implications of implementing the solution.
- Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution.
- Conclusion. One paragraph.